<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If You Are Ignoring Session-Based Broad Match, You Are Losing Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/</link>
	<description>Tips and Thoughts on Google AdWords, Yahoo! Search Marketing, Microsoft adCenter and All Things PPC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irrelevant Keywords Can Be Costly &#124; SouravSharmaDotCom</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>Irrelevant Keywords Can Be Costly &#124; SouravSharmaDotCom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irrelevant Keywords Can Be Costly &#124; NSD Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>Irrelevant Keywords Can Be Costly &#124; NSD Newsletter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irrelevant Keywords Can Be CostlyPage One Web Solutions &#124; Page One Web Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-4271</link>
		<dc:creator>Irrelevant Keywords Can Be CostlyPage One Web Solutions &#124; Page One Web Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-4271</guid>
		<description>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irrelevant Keywords Can Be Costly&#124; Rodney Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-4265</link>
		<dc:creator>Irrelevant Keywords Can Be Costly&#124; Rodney Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-4265</guid>
		<description>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noting that not everyone is unhappy with the session-based clicks. Jordan McClements, commenting on a Clixmarketing post on session-based broad match says, &quot;If you are in a niche where there is not much search traffic, and a new client/sale is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modified Expanded Broad Match and More &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>Modified Expanded Broad Match and More &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>[...] relentless creeping range of broad match over the last few years, and the occasional confusion over session-based broad match, there wasn&#8217;t much there to think about. Well as someone once said, things have changed.The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relentless creeping range of broad match over the last few years, and the occasional confusion over session-based broad match, there wasn&#8217;t much there to think about. Well as someone once said, things have changed.The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Implications of Google AdWords Product Listing Ads &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-3076</link>
		<dc:creator>The Implications of Google AdWords Product Listing Ads &#124; The ClickEquations Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-3076</guid>
		<description>[...] shows up for when you use broad match. They’re already doing this with session-based retargeting (here, and in my article The Rise of Universal Paid Search). There’s no way to opt-out of that option, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shows up for when you use broad match. They’re already doing this with session-based retargeting (here, and in my article The Rise of Universal Paid Search). There’s no way to opt-out of that option, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Improving Google AdWords &#124; The PPC Blog by Matthew Umbro</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Improving Google AdWords &#124; The PPC Blog by Matthew Umbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>[...] the feature is always on.  For further reading, John A. Lee does an excellent job of explaining session-based broach match and its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the feature is always on.  For further reading, John A. Lee does an excellent job of explaining session-based broach match and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2376</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-2376</guid>
		<description>Robert and Al,

Thanks for the comments!

Problem vs. annoyance - either way, it is something that AdWords advertisers need to be aware of. There are still a lot of people out there who aren&#039;t even using Search Query Reports. Education is so important, and that was my primary initiative!  ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert and Al,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments!</p>
<p>Problem vs. annoyance &#8211; either way, it is something that AdWords advertisers need to be aware of. There are still a lot of people out there who aren&#8217;t even using Search Query Reports. Education is so important, and that was my primary initiative!  ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Kuenn</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Kuenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>John,
Great description of the situation.  I view it as more of an annoyance than a problem.  The only real way to prevent it is to keep adding negative kw.  If the click total is high enough to cause real concern, then you should have had a negative keyword in that campaign to stop it anyway.  

It is amusing to see what Google thinks is relevant in this type of match...yet see how they beat you up on quality scores if your keyword is deemed &#039;not relevant&#039;...

-Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Great description of the situation.  I view it as more of an annoyance than a problem.  The only real way to prevent it is to keep adding negative kw.  If the click total is high enough to cause real concern, then you should have had a negative keyword in that campaign to stop it anyway.  </p>
<p>It is amusing to see what Google thinks is relevant in this type of match&#8230;yet see how they beat you up on quality scores if your keyword is deemed &#8216;not relevant&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>-Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Brady</title>
		<link>http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/2010/01/12/if-you-are-ignoring-session-based-broad-match-you-are-losing-money/comment-page-1/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clixmarketing.com/blog/?p=802#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>Business as usual. AdWords pays the bills, so any means of upping the revenue gets pushed live regardless of whether it creates a &quot;better user experience&quot; or not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business as usual. AdWords pays the bills, so any means of upping the revenue gets pushed live regardless of whether it creates a &#8220;better user experience&#8221; or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

